Related Ideas
eyko Ideas
Trade actions, sanctions, and political instability hit supply chains before earnings calls report them. A Geopolitical Supply Chain Scoring Playbook reads country, supplier, lane, and parts data to score geopolitical exposure and identify the supply paths worth diversifying before the next shock lands.
The Challenge
When the team reports country exposure, it appears as "X% from country A". That number averages over the parts, lanes, and tier-2 suppliers where the real exposure sits. A 12% top-line number can hide a single-source dependency that would halt a product line if it disrupted.
Direct supplier data is well-known. Tier-2 and tier-3 (the supplier's supplier) rarely gets mapped. When a geopolitical event hits a tier-3 chip plant, the disruption surfaces in production line A only after the inventory buffer runs out and there is no time to reroute.
Diversification feels expensive when supply is flowing. The conversation gets revisited only after a disruption proves the cost. The window when diversification was affordable closed; the team rebuilds at higher cost under crisis conditions.
How eyko Solves It
A Geopolitical Supply Chain Scoring Playbook reads supplier and parts data, lane and route information, tier-2 and tier-3 mapping where available, country risk feeds (political stability, trade-action history, sanctions risk), and product-line dependency data to score geopolitical exposure per part, supplier, and product line. It surfaces the highest-exposure dependencies, sizes the disruption impact, and recommends diversification moves prioritized by risk-weighted exposure rather than gut feel.
The Playbook scored 184 active suppliers and 4,200 parts across 18 country exposures. 38 parts carry single-source country dependencies in elevated-risk countries, representing $14M in annual spend and 4 product lines' worth of production exposure. The top 12 risk-weighted dependencies account for 64% of the total exposure and are diversifiable within 4 to 6 quarters at moderate cost.
| Metric | Current | Benchmark | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary indicator | Flagged | Target | Action needed |
| Secondary indicator | Monitoring | Within range | On track |
| Trend direction | Declining | Stable | Review required |
Geopolitical Supply Chain Scoring computes exposure per part, supplier, and product line using supplier data, parts mapping, tier-2 and tier-3 dependency, lane and route information, and country risk feeds. The Playbook surfaces the highest-exposure dependencies, sizes the disruption impact, and recommends diversification moves prioritized by risk-weighted exposure so supply chain leadership sees both the headline country exposure and the underlying single-point-of-failure dependencies that drive it.
Related Ideas
FAQ
Everything you need to know about Geopolitical Exposure Map.
Geopolitical Supply Chain Scoring is an AI-driven analysis that computes exposure per part, supplier, and product line using supplier data, parts mapping, tier-2 and tier-3 dependency, lane information, and country risk feeds. The Playbook surfaces the highest-exposure dependencies, sizes the disruption impact, and recommends diversification moves prioritized by risk-weighted exposure so supply chain leadership acts before the next shock lands.
The Playbook reads from your ERP or procurement system (supplier metadata, parts mapping, purchase history, country of origin), transportation management system (lane data, route segments), tier-2 mapping data where collected (supplier disclosures, industry mapping), product master data (bill of materials and parts criticality), and external country risk feeds (political stability indices, sanctions lists, trade-action history). Tier-2 mapping is the gap most often blocking accuracy.
A typical country-exposure report aggregates spend by supplier country. Geopolitical Supply Chain Scoring is granular: it identifies the specific parts, lanes, and product lines exposed, maps tier-2 dependencies that hide behind diversified tier-1, and weights the exposure by disruption-to-impact correlation rather than just spend volume. The granularity is what turns the report into an actionable diversification plan.
Yes. The Playbook ranks diversification opportunities by risk-weighted exposure (probability of disruption x impact if it disrupts) rather than by spend alone. For each top-priority dependency it recommends a qualification plan with regional alternatives, tier-2 mapping investments, and pre-staged buffer inventory on the highest-volume parts. Each recommendation projects expected exposure reduction so leadership can prioritize the highest-leverage moves.
Join the enterprises replacing weeks of manual analysis with a single prompt. See what eyko Playbooks can do with your data.
